Contact lens makers take fight over price law to court

FILE - In this May 13, 2015, file photo, a contact lens is displayed in front of a 1-800-Contacts shipping box in Salt Lake City. A legal battle over a hotly contested Utah law banning minimum prices for contact lenses is set to come before a federal appeals court on Thursday, Aug. 27, 2015. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer, File)
FILE - In this May 13, 2015, file photo, a contact lens is displayed in front of a 1-800-Contacts shipping box in Salt Lake City. A legal battle over a hotly contested Utah law banning minimum prices for contact lenses is set to come before a federal appeals court on Thursday, Aug. 27, 2015. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer, File)

DENVER (AP) — Contact lens makers struggled Thursday to defend their pricing policies in a federal appeals case that could have wide-ranging effects on the $4 billion industry.

At issue is a Utah law banning minimum prices for contact lenses.

The nation’s largest contact lens companies — Alcon Laboratories, Johnson & Johnson and Bausch & Lomb — asked the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver to strike down the measure. They said the law was crafted to help a homegrown discounter, 1-800 Contacts, but has the effect of changing lens pricing nationwide.

“It says to 1-800 Contacts, you can sell to a consumer in Florida, and you can utterly disregard what the manufacturer says the price should be,” said David Marriott, lawyer for Alcon.

But the judges repeatedly challenged the lens makers’ assertion that Utah’s law bans price minimums in other states. The judges grilled the contact lens lawyers about why they don’t simply stop doing business in Utah if they insist on price minimums.

“Where’s the burden the state of Utah is conferring on out-of-state retailers?” asked Judge Jerome Holmes.

A lawyer for Utah accused the contact lens makers of nationwide price-fixing and said lens prices would drop as much as 35 percent nationally if the manufacturers dropped price minimums.

“The state of Utah has said, ‘We are getting rid of a price-fixing scheme,'” said Parker Douglas, who called the lens makers “conspirators.”

Judges asked Utah’s lawyer about whether its law discriminates against out-of-state retailers, who wouldn’t be allowed to use their price minimums at a hypothetical store in St. George.

Douglas insisted that the ban on price minimums is no different than states enforcing different minimum wages or other state-specific laws they’re allowed to enforce.

After temporarily blocking the law earlier this year, the 10th Circuit allowed the measure to take effect as the case unfolds.

1-800 Contacts, one of the country’s largest discount sellers, has since dropped its prices by up to $15 a box on some brands that were subject to the manufacturers’ minimum prices.

The contact lens manufacturers say the Utah law violates interstate commerce regulations because it allows 1-800 Contacts to ignore price minimums in online sales to customers outside state. Utah argues those are considered in-state transactions, no matter where the customer is.

The contact lens makers started setting minimum prices about two years ago to protect eye doctors from being undercut by discount sellers. If a company sells at too steep of a discount, the manufacturers pull their products.

Though most contact sales still come through eye doctors who bring the manufacturers new customers with brand-specific prescriptions, discounters have taken a bigger slice of the market in recent years.

The companies say the pricing policies are good for customers, but they’ve also been scrutinized by Congress, consumer advocates and others.

___

Associated Press writer Lindsay Whitehurst in Salt Lake City contributed to this report.

WNCT-TV 9 On Your Side provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

blog comments powered by Disqus